Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
EP 107/2017

Case between Secratary Perumanna Kalri Service Sahakarn Bank No.F.770 vs Naseer Poomadathil et al regarding default enquiry

Court
Munsiff Magistrate Court at Tirur, Malappuram
Judge
Smt. Vincy TV
Order Date
2018-01-10
Duration
0 years 8 months 28 days
Case Code No.
107
Case Closed
Wed, 01/10/2018 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Petitioner, Secratary Perumanna Kalri Service Sahakarn Bank, filed a petition against judgment debtors Naseer Poomadathil and Shihabudheen Poozhithara. The petitioner sought an enquiry which the petitioner failed to attend, leading to the dismissal of the execution petition for default.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The execution petition was dismissed for default as the petitioner failed to attend the scheduled enquiry.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Not Applicable
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
The execution petition was dismissed for default as the petitioner failed to attend the scheduled enquiry.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Petitioner absent. Even after repeated chances were given the petitioner is not ready for enquiry. Hence EP is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Secratary Perumanna Kalri Service Sahakarn Bank No.F.770
Party Age
1
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Naseer Poomadathil
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shihabudheen Poozhithara
Plaintiffs Documents
Not mentioned
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Jiji.J.D
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Not mentioned
Appearance Type
Not mentioned

Reliefs

Relief Type: Not Applicable
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
Enquiry for execution petition
Evidence:
Petitioner absent. Even after repeated chances were given the petitioner is not ready for enquiry. Hence EP is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Execution Petition
Category
Enforcement of Court Orders
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
EP
Case Code Year
2017

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur, Malappuram
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Tue, 05/23/2017 - 12:00
Case Closed
Wed, 01/10/2018 - 12:00
From
Mon, 01/01/2018 - 12:00
To
Wed, 01/31/2018 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Canara Bank vs Raghunandanan. M.V. et al regarding decree transmission
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Execution Petition Unknown
Case between The Secretary vs Ammiyangara Viswanathan regarding debt satisfaction
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Execution Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between The Secretary vs Chamaparambil Kari et al regarding enforcement of decree
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Execution Petition Dismissed
Case between Secretary, Thennala Service Co-op.Bank Ltd. vs Surendran et al regarding debt repayment
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Execution Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Secretary vs Abdul Azeez et al regarding financial dispute
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Execution Petition Plaintiff Won