Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
IA No. 21 / 2024

Case between Sebastian V Sebastian vs Mita Mariam Sabu et al regarding property rights

Court
MUNSIFF KOLENCHERY
Judge
Smt. Sirsha.N.A
Order Date
2025-09-22
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Petitioner purchased a property and constructed a villa, seeking relief against respondents' alleged violation of rights.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
Petitioner failed to prove prima facie case for relief sought.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Direction Petition
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
Not available

Judgment Evidence:

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Sebastian V Sebastian (28 years years) Flat No. 12 B, Betrons Blossom Villas, Mamala Desam, Thiruvaniyoor Village, Kunnathunadu Taluk, Mamala P.O, Ernakulam District, Pin : 682308

Defendants

Mita Mariam Sabu (32 years years) Thundiyil House, Bethany Nagar II, Convent lane, Nalanchira P. O, Ulloor Village, Thiruvananthapuram Taluk, Thiruvananthapram District, Pin : 695015 Sweta Mary Sabu (32 years years) Thundiyil House, Bethany Nagar II, Convent lane, Nalanchira P. O, Ulloor Village, Thiruvananthapuram Taluk, Thiruvananthapram District, Pin : 695015 Bijo Varghese Mathew (Age not specified years) Thalikuzhyil Melody House, 392A (17/83), Nalanchira P. O, Ulloor Village, Thiruvananthapuram Taluk, Thiruvananthapram District, Pin : 695015 Devesh Sharma (Age not specified years) F123, Panchasheel-3, Raheje Township, Malad East PO, Mumbai, Maharashtra State, Pin : 400097 Mathew George (55 years years) Kalappamannil House, Cherukole P. O, Cherukole Village, Ranni Taluk, Kozhenchery, Pathanamthitta District, Pin : 689650

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Petitioner sought police protection
Evidence:
Petitioner failed to establish a prima facie case
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
No order as to costs
Evidence:

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Established petitioner's ownership of the property
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Commissioner Report
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Evidence provided by court-appointed commissioner
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type: Judgment Copy
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Copy of High Court judgment
Reference:
Ext.B1
Document Type: Commissioner Report
Submitted By: Defendants
Relevance:
Evidence provided by court-appointed commissioner
Reference:
Ext.C2
Document Type: FIR Copy
Submitted By: Unknown
Relevance:
Copy of FIR against petitioner and his father
Reference:
null

Quick Facts

Location
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
50%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases