Case Summary
Complaint filed by the complainant against the accused for the offence punishable under section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act resulting in the accused being acquitted.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Acquittal
Case Type
Criminal Case - N.I. Act
Final Judgment
No
The accused was acquitted under section 256(1) of Cr.P.C.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned.
Reason not clearly mentioned.
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned.
Reason not clearly mentioned.
Supporting Evidence
Today also complainant is absent accused is acquitted u/s.256 (1)Cr.P.C.
Judgment Evidence:
Accused is acquitted u/s.256(1) Cr.P.C.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sayyid Alavikoya Thangal
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Seethikoya Thangal
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Muhammed Zakariya
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. P. Najmudheen
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Acquittal
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Acquittal of the accused under section 256(1) Cr.P.C.
Evidence:
Accused is acquitted u/s.256(1) Cr.P.C.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Criminal Case - N.I. Act
Category
Cheque Bounce Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Dishonoured Cheque
Case Code
Case between Sayyid Alavikoya Thangal and Seethikoya Thangal regarding dishonoured cheque
Case Code Year
Case between Sayyid Alavikoya Thangal and Seethikoya Thangal regarding dishonoured cheque
Case Flags
Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case