Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 288/2025

Case between Satish Murthi vs Varkey Paul regarding appointment of an advocate commissioner

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany
Order Date
2025-03-18
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Satish Murthi has filed a petition for the appointment of an advocate commissioner to inspect certain properties related to the case. Varkey Paul is the respondent in this matter.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court has appointed Advocate Abhishek as the commissioner to inspect the plaint schedule property and assess the works carried out by the defendants.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Appointment of Advocate Commissioner
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The appointment of an advocate Commissioner is deemed necessary to collect valuable inputs for adjudicating the case.

Judgment Evidence:

In the light of the above I order as follows: 1.Advocate Abhishek is appointed as Commissioner in this case.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Satish Murthi (62 years years) A 9D, Willingdon Enclave, Thevara Ferry Road, Cochin- 682013

Defendants

Varkey Paul (Age not specified years) 62/3937 B, Vatakkekara Building, Dr. Ramankutty Panicker Lane, Karikkamuri, Ernakulam- 682011

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Appointment of an Advocate Commissioner for local inspection.
Evidence:
I order as follows: 1. Advocate Abhishek is appointed as Commissioner in this case.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Advocate Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The court ordered the appointment of an Advocate Commissioner to inspect the property and report on the works carried out by the defendants.
Reference:

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases