Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No.288/2025

Case between Sathish Murthi vs Varkey Paul et al regarding garnishment of funds.

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany.
Order Date
2025-03-18
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Sathish Murthi filed a petition against Varkey Paul and others regarding an attempt to withdraw amounts from a bank account to defeat a potential decree. The court is addressing the issue of security and conditional attachment.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court directed the respondent to furnish security for the amount or show cause against the order.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Conditional attachment of Rs. 3,74,748/- and direction to furnish security.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court directed the respondent to furnish security for the amount or show cause against the order.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found sufficient grounds to believe the respondent was trying to defeat the execution of decree.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
I am prima facie satisfied that the respondent with the intent to defeat the execution of decree that may be passed against him is trying to withdraw the amount.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence the respondent is directed to furnish security to the tune of Rs. 3,74,748/- on or before 01.04.2025.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sathish Murthi
Party Age
62
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Varkey Paul
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
The Manager, Canara Bank
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Umadevi M
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Conditional attachment of Rs. 3,74,748/- out of the amount due from the garnishee to the respondent.
Evidence:
Hence the respondent is directed to furnish security to the tune of Rs. 3,74,748/- on or before 01.04.2025 or to show cause why he should not furnish security for the said amount. Further the garnishee is called upon to pay into the court a sum of Rs. 3,74,748/- out of the amount due from them to the respondent or to appear and show cause why they should not do so.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sathish Murthi vs Varkey Paul et al regarding garnishment of funds.
Case Code Year
Case between Sathish Murthi vs Varkey Paul et al regarding garnishment of funds.

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam, Kerala
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 03/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 03/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Garden View Apartment owners Association vs Ansal River Dale owners Association et al regarding Restoration Petition
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Shanoj R vs Joseph Augustin et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s Indo Quartz vs M/s Ray Engineering Pvt. Ltd. et al regarding petition under Order 38 Rule 5 of Code of Civil Procedure.
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Canton Residency Pvt. Ltd. vs Kalamassery Municipality regarding dismissal of suit
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Mrs. Julie Sebastian vs SREECHAND SPECIALITY HOSPITAL PVT. LTD. regarding settlement of claims.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won