Original Suit No. 179 OF 2015

Case between Satheesh.C. et al vs Radhakrishnan regarding injunction

Court

Court of the Munsiff of Tirur

Judge

SRI. BIJU V.G.

Order Date

2015-09-30

Duration

Not mentioned

Case Closed

Wed, 09/30/2015 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Plaintiff Satheesh.C. filed a suit against defendant Radhakrishnan seeking injunction to prevent obstruction from using a specific property as way to access another property. The matter was settled through a compromise petition.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won

Interim Order

The court decreed that the defendants are restrained from causing any obstruction to the plaintiff from using specific property as a way to access another and each party is to bear its own costs.

Judgment Favored

Plaintiff

Relief Granted

Injunction

Case Type

Civil Suit - Injunction

Final Judgment

The court decreed that the defendants are restrained from causing any obstruction to the plaintiff from using specific property as a way to access another and each party is to bear its own costs.

Why Plaintiff Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned

Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Reason not clearly mentioned

Supporting Evidence

Matter settled between parties. Compromise petition is filed as I.A.2671/2015. Since the compromise is lawful, I.A.2671/2015 is allowed.

Judgment Evidence:

In view of the terms of the compromise petition, the suit is decreed as follows:

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Satheesh.C.
Party Age: 36
Relation: S/o Chatha

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Radhakrishnan
Party Age: 58
Relation: S/o Krishnan

Plaintiffs Documents

Compromise petition I.A.2671/2015.

Defendants Documents

None mentioned

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Sri. P. Aboobacker Siddeeq
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Sri. Dileesh.A.
Appearance Type: Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction

Outcome: Granted

Description:

Restrain defendants from causing obstruction to plaintiff accessing specific property

Evidence:

The suit is decreed as follows: 1) The defendants and his men are restrained from causing any obstruction to the plaintiff from using the plaint B schedule property as way to the plaint A schedule property.

Relief Type: Costs

Outcome: Not Decided

Description:

Each party to bear its own costs

Evidence:

The suit is decreed as follows: 2) Both parties shall suffer their respective cost.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Compromise petition

Submitted By: Plaintiff

Relevance:

Formed part of the decree

Reference:

I.A.2671/2015

Case Classification