Case Summary
Sasikumar is the Plaintiff seeking enforcement of a decree against P.D.Satheesan and Vijayamma Satheesan. The court considered an execution petition and allowed the relevant applications.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court disposed of EA.1/2025 and allowed EA.2/2024. The execution petition is stayed, and the decree holder may move an appropriate application with proof of a complete compromise agreement.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
EA.1/2025 is disposed. EA 2/2024 is Allowed. In view of finding of EA.2/2025 EP is stayed and Decree Holder is at liberty to move appropriate application with proof of complete Compromise agreement.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sasikumar
- Party Age
- 68
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- P.D.Satheesan
- Party Age
- 57
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Vijayamma Satheesan
- Party Age
- 54
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- R.K. Prasad
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Vivek Mathew Varkey
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
EA 2/2024 is Allowed.
Evidence:
EA 2/2024 is Allowed.
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
EP is stayed and Decree Holder is at liberty to move appropriate application with proof of complete Compromise agreement.
Evidence:
In view of finding of EA.2/2025 EP is stayed and Decree Holder is at liberty to move appropriate application with proof of complete Compromise agreement.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Execution Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Case Code
O.S.
Case Code Year
2013