Case Summary
The case involves Sasidharan, the plaintiff, who seeks a permanent prohibitory injunction against his son, Aswin, the defendant. The plaintiff claims that the defendant has been disturbing his peaceful possession and enjoyment of property.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
A permanent prohibitory injunction is granted in favour of the plaintiff.
Case Type
Original Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit is decreed in favor of the plaintiff, granting him a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendant.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff established his case through unchallenged oral and documentary evidence.
The plaintiff established his case through unchallenged oral and documentary evidence.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff established his case through unchallenged oral and documentary evidence.
The plaintiff established his case through unchallenged oral and documentary evidence.
Supporting Evidence
Through the unchallenged oral and documentary evidence adduced by the plaintiff, the plaintiff has established his case.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: 1. A permanent prohibitory injunction is granted in favour of the plaintiff and the defendant is restrained from committing any acts which will affects the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the plaintiff in the plaint schedule property.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sasidharan
- Party Age
- 71
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Aswin
- Party Age
- 32
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Certified copy of sale deed No. 1374/2011 of Kadakkavoor, S. R. O., Tax receipt dated 20.07.2022.
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. A. S. Naushad
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. C. Vijayakumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Permanent Injunction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
A permanent prohibitory injunction is granted in favour of the plaintiff restraining the defendant from committing any acts affecting the peaceful possession of the plaintiff.
Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: 1.A permanent prohibitory injunction is granted in favour of the plaintiff and the defendant is restrained from committing any acts which will affects the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the plaintiff in the plaint schedule property.
Relief Type:
Costs
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
No order as to costs.
Evidence:
At the same time, this court is of the further view that the parties can be directed to suffer their respective costs.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Sale deed
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document establishes the ownership of the plaintiff over the plaint schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type:
Tax receipt
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document serves as evidence of the plaintiff's compliance with tax obligations related to the property.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type:
Oral Evidence
Submitted By:
Unknown
Relevance:
This evidence was adduced by the plaintiff to support his case.
Reference:
Case Classification
Case Type
Original Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sasidharan vs Aswin regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
Case Code Year
Case between Sasidharan vs Aswin regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.