Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No.687/2023

Case between Sasi M K vs Unnikrishnan regarding injunction

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K. Dinamany
Order Date
2024-09-26
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Sasi M K filed a petition for appointing an advocate commissioner to measure and demarcate properties related to the suit. Unnikrishnan, the defendant, opposed the petition.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the plaintiff's petition for appointment of an advocate commissioner to measure and demarcate specific properties.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Appointment of an advocate commissioner to measure and demarcate properties.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the plaintiff's petition for appointment of an advocate commissioner to measure and demarcate specific properties.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found sufficient grounds for appointing an Advocate Commissioner for fair adjudication.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court found sufficient grounds for appointing an Advocate Commissioner for fair adjudication.
Supporting Evidence
On perusal of petition averments and records in the case, this court is convinced that the appointment of an Advocate Commissioner to collect valuable inputs for a proper and fair adjudication of the above suit.

Judgment Evidence:

In the light of the above discussion, the petition is allowed on the following terms:- Advocate V.A. Johnson is appointed as the Commissioner in this case.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sasi M K
Party Age
57
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Unnikrishnan
Party Age
32
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Jimmy George
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Arun Francis
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Harikrishnan K
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Appointment of an advocate commissioner to measure and demarcate plaint A, B and C schedule properties.
Evidence:
this court is convinced that the appointment of an Advocate Commissioner to collect valuable inputs for a proper and fair adjudication of the above suit.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sasi M K vs Unnikrishnan regarding injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Sasi M K vs Unnikrishnan regarding injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sun, 09/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Mon, 09/30/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won