Case Summary
The plaintiffs include Sarojini.S and others, while the defendants are led by Sunilkumar. The case was dismissed for default due to the absence of the plaintiffs.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed for default due to the absence of the plaintiffs in court.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
The suit is dismissed for default. No costs.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sarojini.S
- Party Age
- 63
- Relation
- Died
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sasidharan. S
- Party Age
- 56
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Rajendran.S
- Party Age
- 52
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Ambareesan. S
- Party Age
- 51
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Jayakumari.S
- Party Age
- 49
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sunilkumar
- Party Age
- 34
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Mohanan.S
- Party Age
- 60
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sambasivan
- Party Age
- 58
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sudharmma.S
- Party Age
- 54
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- V. Saju
- Party Age
- 46
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. V. Prathap Chandran
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. M.S. Manish
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence.
Evidence:
Since, the plaintiff is neither present nor represented, the suit is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2015