Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No.1348/2020

Case between Sarojini T et al vs Rajappan K et al regarding suit dismissed for default

Court
COURT OF I st ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
Judge
Smt. Karthika.A.R
Order Date
2025-03-07
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, including Sarojini T and her children, filed a suit against the defendants Rajappan K, Santha K, and Nagappan K. The case was dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiffs during the hearing.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit as the plaintiff did not appear for the hearing and no evidence was presented.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit as the plaintiff did not appear for the hearing and no evidence was presented.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiffs failed to appear and did not provide any evidence.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiffs failed to appear and did not provide any evidence.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiffs failed to appear for the hearing and did not submit any affidavits or applications.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence the suit is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sarojini T
Party Age
65
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sunilkumar A
Party Age
53
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Anilkumar A
Party Age
51
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Ajithakumari S
Party Age
49
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rajappan K
Party Age
63
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Santha K
Party Age
61
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Nagappan K
Party Age
51
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Prasanth S S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Jose J J
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Joy M S
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Mahendran B
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. Sinisha V S
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Rajeev Kumar G
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Smt. Ranjini Devi V R
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. R babu
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Gulabi P
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri V J Jayakumar Abraham
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit is dismissed for default.
Evidence:
Hence the suit is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sarojini T et al vs Rajappan K et al regarding suit dismissed for default
Case Code Year
Case between Sarojini T et al vs Rajappan K et al regarding suit dismissed for default

Quick Facts

Location
Thiruvananthapuram
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 03/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 03/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Midhun. M regarding rejection of plaint
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreenath.S vs Thankarajan et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sindhu.S et al vs Lalitha et al regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak vs Babu Chettiyar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won