Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No.2030/2011

Case between Sarasamma et al vs S.Leeladevi et al regarding mediation settlement

Court
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Judge
Smt.Sreelakshmi. C
Order Date
2025-09-16
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves plaintiffs Sarasamma, Ash Kumar, and SalilKumar who are disputing with defendants S.Leeladevi, Sreekala.S.L, and Sooraj. The matter was settled in mediation.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court concluded that both parties had reached a resolution through mediation. The terms of this resolution were accepted by the court.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court concluded that both parties had reached a resolution through mediation. The terms of this resolution were accepted by the court.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The matter was settled in mediation, with terms accepted by both parties.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The matter was settled in mediation, with terms accepted by both parties.
Supporting Evidence
The court acknowledged the mediation's success and accepted the terms thus finalizing the case.

Judgment Evidence:

Matter settled in mediation. Terms accepted and suit decreed in terms of mediation report.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sarasamma
Party Age
71
Relation
W/o Sathyan
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Ash Kumar
Party Age
45
Relation
S/o Sathyan
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
SalilKumar alias Josh Kumar
Party Age
40
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
S.Leeladevi
Party Age
64
Relation
D/o Sarada
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sreekala.S.L
Party Age
43
Relation
D/o Leeladevi
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sooraj
Party Age
39
Relation
S/o K.Sreedharan
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. M.R.Anandakuttan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Nirmal Raj.R.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Rajaprathap.S.J.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Suit decreed in terms of mediation report.
Evidence:
Terms accepted and suit decreed in terms of mediation report.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Mediation Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The mediation report was accepted by both sides and formed part of the decree.
Reference:

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sarasamma et al vs S.Leeladevi et al regarding mediation settlement
Case Code Year
Case between Sarasamma et al vs S.Leeladevi et al regarding mediation settlement

Case Flags

Adalath Resolved
Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Tue, 09/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Midhun. M regarding rejection of plaint
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreenath.S vs Thankarajan et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sindhu.S et al vs Lalitha et al regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak vs Babu Chettiyar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won