Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 457/2024

Case between Sarala M.S et al vs Jolly K.P regarding dismissal of suit for default

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2025-10-27
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, Sarala M.S, Sudheer Babu C.C, and Smitha C.C, initiated a suit against the defendant Jolly K.P. The case was dismissed for default due to the continuous absence of the plaintiffs.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The case was dismissed due to the plaintiffs' continuous absence. Despite specifically being scheduled to appear, the plaintiffs did not represent themselves.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The case was dismissed due to the plaintiffs' continuous absence. Despite specifically being scheduled to appear, the plaintiffs did not represent themselves.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiffs did not appear in court despite being given a specific date to do so.
Why Defendant Won:
Plaintiffs did not appear in court despite being given a specific date to do so.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff absent. Not represented. Defendant represented. Plaintiff continuously absent and not represented.

Judgment Evidence:

This suit was posted for the date specifically for the plaintiff to appear and submit whether the plaintiff is intending to proceed with the suit. Still the plaintiff is absent. Hence, suit is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sarala M.S
Party Age
77
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sudheer Babu C.C
Party Age
49
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Smitha C.C
Party Age
48
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jolly K.P
Party Age
64
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Vimal Dev, Giffin shalon
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Jolly John, Liza Meghan Cyriac, Irene Babu, Harikrishna S, Reshmi C.S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's continuous absence.
Evidence:
This suit was posted for the date specifically for the plaintiff to appear and submit whether the plaintiff is intending to proceed with the suit. Still the plaintiff is absent. Hence, suit is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sarala M.S et al vs Jolly K.P regarding dismissal of suit for default
Case Code Year
Case between Sarala M.S et al vs Jolly K.P regarding dismissal of suit for default

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 10/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won