Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS 302/2025

Case between Saradhamma K.R vs Vasudevan Nair regarding temporary injunction

Court
Court of the Munsiff, Kottayam
Judge
Smt. Jyothi Babu R.
Order Date
2025-08-14
Duration
Case Code No.
302
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Saradhamma K.R filed a petition seeking a temporary injunction against Vasudevan Nair. The application was based on the concern that allowing notice would cause delays undermining the purpose of the injunction.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court granted an ad interim injunction to restrain the defendant and his associates from causing obstruction to the plaintiff's use of the way identified in the plaint.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Ad interim injunction granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court granted an ad interim injunction to restrain the defendant and his associates from causing obstruction to the plaintiff's use of the way identified in the plaint.
Why Plaintiff Won:
A prima facie case was made out by the plaintiff indicating urgency requiring immediate relief.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
I am satisfied that prima facie case has been made out and if notice issued delay will occurred which will defeat the very purpose of the above application.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence an ad interim injunction is granted restraining the counter petitioner and people under him from causing obstruction to the user of the plaint schedule item no. 3 way until further steps.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Saradhamma K.R
Party Age
86
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Vasudevan Nair
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Gangaprasad S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
ad interim injunction restraining the counter petitioner and people under him from causing obstruction to the user of the plaint schedule item no. 3 way
Evidence:
the court on same day passed the following. ORDER This is an application filed under Order 39 Rule 1 of CPC for temporary injunction. Heard Learned Counsel for the petitioner/plaintiff. Perused the affidavit, plaint and documents. I am satisfied that prima facie case has been made out and if notice issued delay will occurred which will defeat the very purpose of the above application. Hence an ad interim injunction is granted restraining the counter petitioner and people under him from causing obstruction to the user of the plaint schedule item no. 3 way until further steps.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS
Case Code Year
2025

Quick Facts

Location
Kottayam
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Fri, 08/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Tue, 09/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between State Bank of India vs Nishana K C regarding decree of suit
Munsiff Court/Judicial First Class Magistrate -IV, Kottayam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Asset Sapphire Apartment Owners Association vs Amal Shaji et al regarding petition for document production
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Aniyamma Joseph et al vs Akhil Joseph et al regarding civil matters.
Munsiff Court/ Judicial First Class Magistrate -IV, Kottayam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ajitha Jibi vs Sherin Mathew et al regarding compromise petition.
Munsiff Court/ Judicial First Class Magistrate -IV, Kottayam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Surendran et al vs Daniel. K.P. et al regarding partition of property.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won