Case Summary
Santhosh Mathew filed a suit against Sunil K.K. Both parties were represented in court, but the plaintiff was not present during the hearing. As a result, the suit was dismissed for default.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit as the plaintiff was not present during the hearing.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Suit dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Santhosh Mathew
- Party Age
- 52
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sunil K.K
- Party Age
- 42
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sabu Thozhuppadan K
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Antony Varghese
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Shiju Varghese
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Hena O.S
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Manju T.M
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Suit dismissed for default
Evidence:
Suit dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Santhosh Mathew vs Sunil K.K regarding default dismissal
Case Code Year
Case between Santhosh Mathew vs Sunil K.K regarding default dismissal