Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 767/2019

Case between Santha vs Thankamma et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Court
THE I ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Padmakumar.G.
Order Date
2024-03-23
Duration
approximately-4 years 15 days
Case Closed
Sat, 03/23/2024 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Santha is the plaintiff seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, Thankamma and her children, regarding a disputed property. The plaintiff claims ownership and fears trespass by the defendants.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed a permanent prohibitory injunction preventing the defendants from trespassing into the plaintiff's property. The plaintiff was found to be the owner in possession of the disputed property.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Permanent prohibitory injunction
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed a permanent prohibitory injunction preventing the defendants from trespassing into the plaintiff's property. The plaintiff was found to be the owner in possession of the disputed property.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff proved her ownership and settled possession of the property.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The allegation that the plaintiff had sold the property included in schedule A to the Partition deed could not be proved by any oral or documentary evidence.

Judgment Evidence:

The suit is decreed without costs as follows: 1. The defendants their men and agents are restrained by a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction from trespassing into the plaint schedule property or doing anything injurious to the plaintiff’s right, title and interest over plaint schedule property.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Santha
Party Age
66
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Thankamma
Party Age
68
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shalu
Party Age
48
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Santhosh
Party Age
45
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Photocopy of certificate of purchase, Certificate copy document no 747/78 of SRO Ernakulam, Original building tax receipt & ownership certificate, Photocopy of ration card, Residence certificate issued by Kumbalam grama panchayath, Certificate copy of document no 2290/83 of SRO, Ernakulam.
Defendants Documents
Certified copy of Partition deed no 2571/1982.

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
N.C.Joseph
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
T.B.Gafoor
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
K.Mohan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff sought a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction to restrain the defendants from trespassing into the plaint schedule property.
Evidence:
The defendants their men and agents are restrained by a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction from trespassing into the plaint schedule property or doing anything injurious to the plaintiff’s right, title and interest over plaint schedule property.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Purchase Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The document establishes the original ownership of the property by Narayani.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Settlement Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This deed shows the settlement of 5 cents of property in favor of the second and third defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Building Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
It serves as proof of the plaintiff’s ownership and residence in the plaint schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Ration Card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The ration card serves to confirm the identity and residency of the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Residence Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This certificate is issued by Kumbalam Grama Panchayat certifying the plaintiff's residence.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Certified copy of document
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
It documents the sale of the property sold by the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Partition Deed
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
This deed provides evidence regarding the partition of the property and the shares allotted.
Reference:
Ext.B1

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Santha vs Thankamma et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Santha vs Thankamma et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Fri, 03/08/2019 - 12:00
Case Closed
Sat, 03/23/2024 - 12:00
From
Fri, 03/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Sun, 03/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won