Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 926/2022

Case between Sanjuna Sadique vs Raseena A. R et al regarding dismissal of suit.

Court
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-01-10
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Sanjuna Sadique is the plaintiff, and Raseena A. R and others are the defendants. The case was dismissed due to the continuous absence of both parties without representation.

Judgment Outcome

Partial Relief
Interim Order
The case was dismissed due to the absence of both parties without representation.
Judgment Favored
Dismissed
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:

Judgment Evidence:

Both sides no representation. Both sides are continuously absent without representation. Listed case. Not present or ready for evidence. Dismissed.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Sanjuna Sadique (28 years) 3/3/K2, Flat 9B, Silver Star Flat, Kargil Road, Moolepadam Road, Vazhakkala, Vazhakkala Village, Kanayannur Taluk, Ernakulam – 682 021

Defendants

Raseena A. R (27 years) Valingal House, Ruby Lane, Thammanam – 682 032 Arshal (33 years) Valingal House, Ruby Lane, Thammanam – 682 032 Riyas (Age not specified years) 7/944, PWRA 32, Panayappilly, Mattanchery S.O, Ernakulam – 682 002 Asura (55 years) Valingal House, Ruby Lane, Thammanam – 682 032 Rasheed (Age not specified years) 7/944, PWRA 32, Panayapilly, Mattanchery S.O, Ernakulam – 682 002

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases