Case Summary
Sandeep Mathew K.A filed a suit against Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd. and others for recovery of money and damages following an alleged wrongful termination of his employment. The plaintiff claims he was coerced into resigning and seeks compensation for his losses.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court found in favor of the defendants, dismissing the suit as the plaintiff failed to provide sufficient evidence to support his claims. The case was concluded with the rejection of the plaintiff's demands for monetary recovery.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff failed to establish a valid claim for damages or loss due to the defendants' actions.
The plaintiff failed to establish a valid claim for damages or loss due to the defendants' actions.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff has failed to establish that he had suffered any loss or damage on account of the action/inaction on the part of the defendants or that the plaintiff is entitled to get the amount as sought for.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, the suit is dismissed. The defendants are entitled to the costs of the suit from the plaintiff.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sandeep Mathew K.A
- Party Age
- 32
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd.
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- The Managing Director, Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd.
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Allwyn Fernandes
- Party Age
- 38
Plaintiffs Documents
Letter issued by Torrent Pharmaceuticals Limited, Contract of Employment, Legal Notice, Resignation Letter, Apology Letter
Defendants Documents
Resignation Acceptance Letter, Email Communication, Letter of Authorization
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Shiju Varghese
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- M. Gopalakrishnan Nambiar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Dominic Antony
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- V. Bharath Kumar
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Keshavraj Nair
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Recovery
Outcome:
Refused
Description:
Recovery of an amount of 24,127/- from defendants together with interest.
Evidence:
The plaintiff has failed to establish that he had suffered any loss or damage on account of the action/inaction on the part of the defendants or that the plaintiff is entitled to get the amount as sought for.
Relief Type:
Damages
Outcome:
Refused
Description:
Compensation for 100,000/- as prayed for.
Evidence:
The plaintiff has failed to establish that he had suffered any loss or damage on account of the action/inaction on the part of the defendants or that the plaintiff is entitled to get the amount as sought for.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Letter issued by Torrent Pharmaceuticals Limited
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Initial employment documentation for the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type:
Contract of Employment
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Formal agreement outlining the terms of employment for the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type:
E-mail Communication
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Communication related to employment matters.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type:
E-mail Communication
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Communication pertaining to work duties.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type:
E-mail Communication
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Further communication in relation to job responsibilities.
Reference:
Ext.A4(a)
Document Type:
Travelling Ticket
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Documentation related to travel for work purposes.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type:
Hotel Confirmation Voucher
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proof of accommodation related to work travel.
Reference:
Ext.A5(a)
Document Type:
Hotel Confirmation Voucher
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Additional proof of accommodation during work-related travel.
Reference:
Ext.A5(b)
Document Type:
Travelling Ticket
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Further documentation related to work travel.
Reference:
Ext.A5(c)
Document Type:
Travelling Ticket
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Travel documentation relevant to the case.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type:
Discharge Summary
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Medical documentation relevant for the case.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type:
Inpatient Cash Bill
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Bill related to medical expenses.
Reference:
Ext.A7(a)
Document Type:
O.P Medicine Charges
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Documentation for medical charges.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type:
I.P Bill
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Hospital bill documenting inpatient services.
Reference:
Ext.A8(a)
Document Type:
O.P Medicine Charges
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Further medical charges related to outpatient treatment.
Reference:
Ext.A8(b)
Document Type:
O.P Medicine Charges
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Additional outpatient medical charges.
Reference:
Ext.A8(c)
Document Type:
Discharge Summary
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Summary of discharge from hospital relevant to the case.
Reference:
Ext.A8(d)
Document Type:
Legal Notice
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Notice sent to defendants regarding withheld salary.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type:
E-mail Communication
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Further communication concerning legal matters.
Reference:
Ext.A10
Document Type:
Reply Notice
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Response from the defendants regarding the legal notice.
Reference:
Ext.A11
Document Type:
Copy of Letter
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document related to the plaintiff's employment.
Reference:
Ext.A12
Document Type:
Copy of Resignation Acceptance Letter
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document acknowledging the plaintiff's resignation.
Reference:
Ext.A13
Document Type:
Letter
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Additional documentation related to the case.
Reference:
Ext.A14
Document Type:
E-mail Communication
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Communication pertinent to the plaintiff's employment.
Reference:
Ext.A15
Document Type:
E-mail Communication
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Further relevant communication.
Reference:
Ext.A16
Document Type:
E-mail Communication
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Continued legal correspondence.
Reference:
Ext.A17
Document Type:
Certificate and Declaration u/s. 65 B of Indian Evidence Act
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certification of evidence presented in court.
Reference:
Ext.A18
Document Type:
Resignation Letter
Submitted By:
Defendant
Relevance:
Document evidencing the plaintiff's resignation.
Reference:
Ext.B1
Document Type:
Apology Letter
Submitted By:
Defendant
Relevance:
Document showing a prior apology from the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.B2
Document Type:
Resignation Acceptance Letter
Submitted By:
Defendant
Relevance:
Confirmation of the plaintiff's resignation.
Reference:
Ext.B3
Document Type:
E-mail Communication
Submitted By:
Defendant
Relevance:
Communication concerning the plaintiff's employment.
Reference:
Ext.B4
Document Type:
Letter of Authorization
Submitted By:
Defendant
Relevance:
Authorization related documentation.
Reference:
Ext.B5
Document Type:
E-mail Communication
Submitted By:
Defendant
Relevance:
Communication relevant to the case.
Reference:
Ext.B6
Document Type:
E-mail Communication
Submitted By:
Defendant
Relevance:
Further relevant communication.
Reference:
Ext.B7
Document Type:
E-mail Communication
Submitted By:
Defendant
Relevance:
Continued communication regarding the case.
Reference:
Ext.B8
Document Type:
E-mail Communication
Submitted By:
Defendant
Relevance:
Additional relevant correspondence.
Reference:
Ext.B9
Document Type:
E-mail Communication
Submitted By:
Defendant
Relevance:
Further communication from the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.B10
Document Type:
E-mail Communication
Submitted By:
Defendant
Relevance:
Documented communication for the case.
Reference:
Ext.B11
Document Type:
E-mail Communication
Submitted By:
Defendant
Relevance:
Further emails from the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.B12
Document Type:
E-mail Communication
Submitted By:
Defendant
Relevance:
Additional correspondence related to the case.
Reference:
Ext.B13
Document Type:
E-mail Communication
Submitted By:
Defendant
Relevance:
More communications relevant to ongoing matters.
Reference:
Ext.B14
Document Type:
E-mail Communication
Submitted By:
Defendant
Relevance:
Email relevant to the employment situation.
Reference:
Ext.B15
Document Type:
E-mail Communication
Submitted By:
Defendant
Relevance:
Continued correspondence regarding the plaintiff's status.
Reference:
Ext.B16
Document Type:
E-mail Communication
Submitted By:
Defendant
Relevance:
Documentation regarding employment correspondence.
Reference:
Ext.B17
Document Type:
E-mail Communication
Submitted By:
Defendant
Relevance:
Further communications for evidence.
Reference:
Ext.B18
Document Type:
E-mail Communication
Submitted By:
Defendant
Relevance:
Final communications related to employment issues.
Reference:
Ext.B19
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Compensation and Damages
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between Sandeep Mathew K.A vs Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd. et al regarding recovery of money and damages.
Case Code Year
Case between Sandeep Mathew K.A vs Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd. et al regarding recovery of money and damages.