Case Summary
The petitioners, Samson T George and Babu Mathew, are seeking a temporary injunction against the respondents, Arun Kumar Karerat and Devadas P K. The court found that granting the injunction is necessary to prevent irreparable injury to the petitioners.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Interim injunction restraining respondents from encumbering or selling the properties
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court granted a temporary injunction against the defendants, preventing them from encumbering, selling, or altering the plaint schedule properties.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioners demonstrated a prima facie case and the potential for irreparable injury if the injunction was not granted.
The petitioners demonstrated a prima facie case and the potential for irreparable injury if the injunction was not granted.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
I am satisfied that the petitioners have made out a prima facie case and if order of temporary injunction is not granted, irreparable injury is likely to be caused to the petitioners.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence an order of interim injunction is passed restraining respondents 1 and 2 and their men and agents from encumbering, selling, inducting strangers into the plaint schedule properties and from demolishing the internal walls and other structures in the plaint B schedule apartment until further orders.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Samson T George
- Party Age
- 60
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Babu Mathew @ Parayil Mathew Babu
- Party Age
- 67
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Arun Kumar Karerat
- Party Age
- 59
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Devadas P K
- Party Age
- 39
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- C S Manu
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Dilu Joseph
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- T B Sivaprasad
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- C Y Vijayakumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Manju E R
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Dainy Davis
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Paul Jose
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Alint Joseph
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Anandhu Satheesh
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Enoch David Simon Joel
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Abraham Mathew Vettoor
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Praveen
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Surya B Chandran
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Temporary Injunction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
An order of interim injunction is passed restraining respondents 1 and 2 and their men and agents from encumbering, selling, inducting strangers into the plaint schedule properties and from demolishing the internal walls and other structures in the plaint B schedule apartment until further orders.
Evidence:
Hence an order of interim injunction is passed restraining respondents 1 and 2 and their men and agents from encumbering, selling, inducting strangers into the plaint schedule properties and from demolishing the internal walls and other structures in the plaint B schedule apartment until further orders.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Samson T George et al vs Arun Kumar Karerat et al regarding temporary injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Samson T George et al vs Arun Kumar Karerat et al regarding temporary injunction