Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 561/2024

Case between Samson T. George et al vs Arun Kumar Karerat et al regarding temporary injunction

Court
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-07-04
Duration
approximately-1 year

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, Samson T. George and Babu Mathew, are seeking a temporary injunction against the defendants, Arun Kumar Karerat and Dr. Shaloo Ipe, who are allegedly in unlawful possession of property owned by the plaintiffs. The case involves disputes over forged agreements and the defendants' attempts to sell the property.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the plaintiffs' application for a temporary injunction, lifting the previously granted ad-interim injunction and ordering the parties to bear their own costs.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The court found that the defendants demonstrated lawful possession based on a joint venture agreement.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the IA stands dismissed. The ad-interim order dated 03/06/2024 granted in this IA stands lifted.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Samson T. George (56 years) Thanninilkunnathil House, Paiyaram, Elanthoor P.O., Elanthoor Village, Kolenchery Taluk, now residing at P.O.Box No.9330, Ahamadi Kuwait Babu Mathew @ Parayil Mathew Babu (63 years) Theoidical House, Theodical P.O., Ranni, Ayiroor Village, Pathanamthitta District, PIN-689613

Defendants

Arun Kumar Karerat (59 years) 1108, Sunny Palace, Changampuzha Samadhi Road, Edappally P.O., PIN – 682 024 Dr. Shaloo Ipe (69 years) Flat No.2221, 22nd Floor, Jade Height-1, MIR Green Metropolis, Kakkanad, Ernakulam, PIN – 682 021

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Interim injunction as sought for by the petitioners is denied.
Evidence:
I am of the opinion that the petitioners are not entitled to an order of injunction as prayed for.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Mon, 01/01/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases