Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 560/2024

Case between Samson T. George et al vs Arun Kumar Karerat et al regarding temporary injunction

Court
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-07-04
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves a petition filed by the plaintiffs who claim ownership of certain properties. They seek a temporary injunction to prevent the defendants from occupying the properties, alleging that the defendants are in unlawful possession.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the petition for a temporary injunction filed by the plaintiffs, finding that the defendants did not unlawfully occupy the property. The interim injunction previously granted was lifted.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The defendants were found to be in lawful possession based on a joint venture agreement.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the IA stands dismissed. The ad-interim order dated 03/06/2024 granted in this IA stands lifted.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Samson T. George (56 years years) Thanninilkunnathil House, Paiyaram, Elanthoor P.O., Elanthoor Village, Kolenchery Taluk, now residing at P.O. Box No. 9330, Ahamadi Kuwait Babu Mathew @ Parayil Mathew Babu (63 years years) Theoidical House, Theodical P.O., Ranni, Ayiroor Village, Pathanamthitta District, PIN- 689 613

Defendants

Arun Kumar Karerat (59 years years) 1108, Sunny Palace, Changampuzha Samadhi Road, Edappally P.O., PIN – 682 024 Sunitha Nair (44 years years) Flat No. 2242, 24th Floor, Jade Height-1, MIR Green Metropolis, Kakkanad, Ernakulam, PIN – 682 021 Susheela R Nair (64 years years) Flat No. 2242, 24th Floor, Jade Height-1, MIR Green Metropolis, Kakkanad, Ernakulam, PIN – 682 021

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Requested temporary injunction to prevent defendants from continuing their possession.
Evidence:
the petitioners are not entitled to an interim injunction as sought for

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Joint Venture Agreement
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Produced by the defendants to support their claim of lawful possession.
Reference:
Ext.B1

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases