Case Summary
The petitioners, Samson T. George and Babu Mathew, are seeking a temporary injunction against the defendants, Arun Kumar Karerat and Deepthi S. Raj, regarding possession of certain properties. The plaintiffs claim the defendants are in unlawful possession based on forged agreements.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the petition for a temporary injunction sought by the plaintiffs, stating that the second defendant has obtained possession of the property based on a joint venture agreement.
Key Reasoning:
The court found that the second defendant had a prima facie case of lawful possession based on valid agreements.
The court found that the second defendant had a prima facie case of lawful possession based on valid agreements.
Why Defendant Won:
The court found that the second defendant had a prima facie case of lawful possession based on valid agreements.
The court found that the second defendant had a prima facie case of lawful possession based on valid agreements.
Supporting Evidence
The petitioners are not entitled to an interim injunction as sought for and that the ad-interim injunction granted in their favour is to be lifted.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, the IA stands dismissed. The ad-interim order dated 03/06/2024 granted in this IA stands lifted.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Samson T. George
- Party Age
- 56
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Babu Mathew @ Parayil Mathew Babu
- Party Age
- 63
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Arun Kumar Karerat
- Party Age
- 59
- Relation
- Son of
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Deepthi S. Raj
- Party Age
- 43
- Relation
- Wife of
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- P. Suresh
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- K. A Shaji Mathew
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Amal M
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Riyan Augustine Shaji
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Abraham Mathew
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Anil Abey Jose
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Amal Tom
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Vishnuja P.M
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Enoch David Simon Joel
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- S. Sreedev
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Rony Jose
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Leo Lukose
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Karol Mathews Sebastian Alencherry
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Derick Mathai Saji
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Karan Scaria Abraham
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Ittoop Joy Thattil
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Refused
Description:
The petitioners sought an interim injunction.
Evidence:
I am of the opinion that the petitioners are not entitled to an order of injunction as prayed for.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Samson T. George et al vs Arun Kumar Karerat et al regarding temporary injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Samson T. George et al vs Arun Kumar Karerat et al regarding temporary injunction