Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 537/2024

Case between Samson T. George et al vs Arun Kumar Karerat et al regarding temporary injunction

Court
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-07-04
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves petitioners Samson T. George and Babu Mathew seeking a temporary injunction against respondents Arun Kumar Karerat and Sujith Chembil Kunnuth regarding ownership of certain properties. The plaintiffs claim the defendants are unlawfully occupying their property based on forged agreements.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the petitioners' request for a temporary injunction, lifting the previous ad-interim order. The court found that the second defendant has a prima facie case in their favor based on the joint venture agreement.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The prima facie case and balance of convenience is in favor of the second defendant.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the IA stands dismissed. The ad-interim order dated 03/06/2024 granted in this IA stands lifted.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Samson T. George (56 years years) Thanninilkunnathil House, Paiyaram, Elanthoor P.O., Elanthoor Village, Kolenchery Taluk, now residing at P.O. Box No.9330, Ahamadi Kuwait Babu Mathew @ Parayil Mathew Babu (63 years years) Theoidical House, Theodical P.O., Ranni, Ayiroor Village, Pathanamthitta District, PIN -689 613

Defendants

Arun Kumar Karerat (59 years years) 1108, Sunny Palace, Changampuzha Samadhi Road, Edappally P.O., PIN – 682 024 Sujith Chembil Kunnuth (53 years years) Flat No. 2273, Type C, 27th Floor, Jade Height -1, MIR Green Metropolis, Kakkanad, Ernakulam, PIN – 682 021

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Petitioners sought an interim injunction
Evidence:
I am of the opinion therefore that the petitioners are not entitled to an order of injunction as prayed for.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
70%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases