Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
R.C.P. No. 124/2021

Case between Samil Jamal vs Bharath Sanchar Nigam Ltd. regarding rent control petition

Court
THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
Sri. Reghunath N.S.
Order Date
2024-01-23
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Samil Jamal, represented by his wife, filed a petition against Bharath Sanchar Nigam Ltd. regarding a rent control issue. The court dismissed the petition after it was not pressed by the petitioner.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The petition was dismissed as not pressed, meaning the petitioner did not pursue the case further.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The petition was dismissed as not pressed, meaning the petitioner did not pursue the case further.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Reason not clearly mentioned

Judgment Evidence:

In the light of above endorsement, petition is dismissed as not pressed. No costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Samil Jamal
Party Age
34
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Mrs. Nuzila C.B.
Party Age
28
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Bharath Sanchar Nigam Ltd.
Relation
Represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
Not available
Defendants Documents
Not available

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Varghese Parambil V.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Albert Joseph Angamaly
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Boban Varghese
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
T.K. Kunjumon
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Bobby J. Arakunnel
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Suneer K.S.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
K.M. Jamaludheen
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Petition was dismissed as not pressed.
Evidence:
In the light of above endorsement, petition is dismissed as not pressed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Samil Jamal vs Bharath Sanchar Nigam Ltd. regarding rent control petition
Case Code Year
Case between Samil Jamal vs Bharath Sanchar Nigam Ltd. regarding rent control petition

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 01/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Wed, 01/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Telecom

Similar Cases

Case between V.K.Jayachandran vs Nisha M.V regarding petition under Section 11(2)(b) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control)Act, 1965
THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Rent Control Petition Unknown
Case between Liya George vs Sulaiman regarding Petition under Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965
THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Rent Control Petition Dismissed
Case between Robin Thomas Vaidyan vs RAHA Ayurveda Hospital et al regarding eviction
Court of the Third Additional Munsiff & Rent Controller, Ernakulam
Rent Control Petition Unknown
Case between Mrs. Susan Jacob John @ Susan John & Dr. Maria Kuriakose vs Mr. Annekot Ramadasan Padmakumar regarding Petition filed under Section 11(2)(b) of the Kerala (Buildings Lease & Rent Control) Act, 1965
The Third Additional Munsiff & Rent Controller, Ernakulam
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Munir Gul Mohammed Sait et al vs K.M. Abdulla et al regarding Rent Control Petition
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Rent Control Petition Unknown