Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 445 OF 2014

Case between Sameerbabu et al vs Nazer et al regarding injunction.

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Judge
Smt. VINCY.T.V.
Order Date
2017-02-06
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Plaintiffs Sameerbabu, Abdul Razaq, and others are involved in a suit for injunction against defendants Nazer, Shahul Hammed, and Kabeer. The plaintiffs' counsel reported no instructions from the plaintiff.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit due to the absence of the plaintiffs and their counsel's report of no instructions.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit due to the absence of the plaintiffs and their counsel's report of no instructions.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiffs failed to appear and provide instructions.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff's counsel reported that he has no instruction from his client. Name of the plaintiff is called. No representation.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit is dismissed with costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sameerbabu
Party Age
30
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Abdul Razaq
Party Age
42
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Hussain
Party Age
43
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Alavikkutty
Party Age
56
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Muhammedkutty
Party Age
44
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Nazer
Party Age
42
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shahul Hammed
Party Age
30
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Kabeer
Party Age
25
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Dinesh Pookkayil
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. K.P. Khaleel Ibrahim
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit for injunction was dismissed.
Evidence:
hence suit is dismissed with costs.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sameerbabu et al vs Nazer et al regarding injunction.
Case Code Year
Case between Sameerbabu et al vs Nazer et al regarding injunction.

Quick Facts

Location
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 02/01/2017 - 12:00
To
Sat, 02/28/2026 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Vettikkat Parikkuzhiyil Beerali vs Thayyil Kader Haji regarding unknown matter
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vineeshkumar et al vs Kumaran regarding compliance with High Court directions
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between V.K.Savithry Amma vs Marakkar et al regarding unknown
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vallikkadan Ibrahim Musliar vs Muhammed Abdul Noor regarding default judgment
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kalathil Prabhakaran vs Leela.K.Nair et al regarding unknown matter
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won