Case Summary
This case involves Salim as the plaintiff and Shajahan as the defendant. The court rejected the plaint due to the plaintiff's failure to remit the balance court fee.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The plaint was rejected due to the plaintiff not remitting the balance court fee.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff failed to remit the balance court fee as required.
The plaintiff failed to remit the balance court fee as required.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff failed to remit the balance court fee as required.
The plaintiff failed to remit the balance court fee as required.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff was absent and did not remit the balance court fee.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, the plaint is rejected under Order VII Rule 11(c) of Code of Civil Procedure.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Salim
- Party Age
- 44
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Shajahan
- Party Age
- 52
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Petition to set aside exparte order
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. C.R. Suresh Kumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Vineeth V.T
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
Plaint rejected for failure to remit Balance Court Fee.
Evidence:
Hence, the plaint is rejected under Order VII Rule 11(c) of Code of Civil Procedure.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2023