Case Summary
Salim Manzoor filed a petition for eviction against Ushakumari. The petitioner was absent during the hearing, leading to a dismissal for want of prosecution.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Eviction
Final Judgment
No
The petition for eviction was dismissed due to the absence of the petitioner.
Key Reasoning:
The petitioner was continuously absent, resulting in the dismissal of the petition.
The petitioner was continuously absent, resulting in the dismissal of the petition.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The petitioner was continuously absent and no representation also.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence petition dismissed for want of prosecution.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Salim Manzoor
- Party Age
- 60
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Ushakumari
- Relation
- D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Jairam Gopal Anippallil
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Kappil D.Sunil
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- D.Sathyapal
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Eviction
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Petition for eviction filed by the petitioner.
Evidence:
Hence petition dismissed for want of prosecution.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Eviction
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Eviction
Case Code
Case between Salim Manzoor vs Ushakumari regarding eviction
Case Code Year
Case between Salim Manzoor vs Ushakumari regarding eviction