Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
R.C.P. No. 22/2020

Case between Salam et al vs Kamarudeen regarding rent control petition

Court
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
SMT. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2025-06-18
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves Salam and others as landlords petitioning against Kamarudeen, a tenant, under the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act. The landlords decided not to pursue the petition, leading to its dismissal.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the rent control petition as not pressed by the landlords.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the rent control petition as not pressed by the landlords.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Rent control petition is dismissed as not pressed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Salam
Party Age
54
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Saly
Party Age
50
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sakeer
Party Age
46
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sameer
Party Age
41
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Kamarudeen
Party Age
62
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
None
Defendants Documents
None

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Joby Jacob Pulickekudy
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Anil George
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Ancy T.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Fathima Sulfath N.B.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Dajish John
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
K.G. Cleetus
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Peter lal Murimattom
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Rent control petition is dismissed as not pressed.
Evidence:
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the rent control petition need not be proceed with.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Salam et al vs Kamarudeen regarding rent control petition
Case Code Year
Case between Salam et al vs Kamarudeen regarding rent control petition

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sun, 06/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between V.K.Jayachandran vs Nisha M.V regarding petition under Section 11(2)(b) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control)Act, 1965
THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Rent Control Petition Unknown
Case between Liya George vs Sulaiman regarding Petition under Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965
THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Rent Control Petition Dismissed
Case between Robin Thomas Vaidyan vs RAHA Ayurveda Hospital et al regarding eviction
Court of the Third Additional Munsiff & Rent Controller, Ernakulam
Rent Control Petition Unknown
Case between Mrs. Susan Jacob John @ Susan John & Dr. Maria Kuriakose vs Mr. Annekot Ramadasan Padmakumar regarding Petition filed under Section 11(2)(b) of the Kerala (Buildings Lease & Rent Control) Act, 1965
The Third Additional Munsiff & Rent Controller, Ernakulam
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Munir Gul Mohammed Sait et al vs K.M. Abdulla et al regarding Rent Control Petition
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Rent Control Petition Unknown