Case Summary
The petitioners, including Salam and others, sought relief regarding the possession of a rental property. The respondent, George M.U., surrendered possession of the property, leading to the disposal of the petition.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The respondent voluntarily surrendered possession of the property, making further proceedings unnecessary.
The respondent voluntarily surrendered possession of the property, making further proceedings unnecessary.
Judgment Evidence:
Accordingly the rent control petition is disposed of. Pending IA’s closed. No Costs.
Parties Involved
Plaintiffs
Salam (52 years)
Poovathummottil House, Edappally P.O., Toll Gate, Ernakulam-682024
Saly (49 years)
Poovathummottil House, Edappally P.O., Toll Gate, Ernakulam-682024
Sakeer (44 years)
Poovathummottil House, Edappally P.O., Toll Gate, Ernakulam-682024
Sameer (39 years)
Poovathummottil House, Edappally P.O., Toll Gate, Ernakulam-682024
Defendants
George M.U. (Age not specified years)
Malamel House, Door No.XXXIII/745 [Kalamassery Municipality] "Kadavil Mansion", Edappally P.O., Toll junction, Ernakulam-682 024
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The rent control petition is disposed of due to the respondent surrendering vacant possession of the property.
Evidence:
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondent has surrendered the vacant possession of petition schedule building. Hence no purpose will be served in proceeding with this rent control petition.