Case Summary
The petitioners, including Salam and others, sought relief regarding the possession of a rental property. The respondent, George M.U., surrendered possession of the property, leading to the disposal of the petition.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court accepted the surrender of the rental property by the respondent. Consequently, the rent control petition was disposed of.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The respondent voluntarily surrendered possession of the property, making further proceedings unnecessary.
The respondent voluntarily surrendered possession of the property, making further proceedings unnecessary.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The respondent voluntarily surrendered possession of the property, making further proceedings unnecessary.
The respondent voluntarily surrendered possession of the property, making further proceedings unnecessary.
Supporting Evidence
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondent has surrendered the vacant possession of petition schedule building.
Judgment Evidence:
Accordingly the rent control petition is disposed of. Pending IA’s closed. No Costs.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Salam
- Party Age
- 52
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Saly
- Party Age
- 49
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sakeer
- Party Age
- 44
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sameer
- Party Age
- 39
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- George M.U.
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Joby Jacob Pulickekudy
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Anil George
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sumeesh. Ancy T.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Nivya Valsan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Fathima Sulflath N.B.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Dinic J. Coycara
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- K.G. Cleetus
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The rent control petition is disposed of due to the respondent surrendering vacant possession of the property.
Evidence:
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondent has surrendered the vacant possession of petition schedule building. Hence no purpose will be served in proceeding with this rent control petition.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Salam et al vs George M.U. regarding rent control dispute
Case Code Year
Case between Salam et al vs George M.U. regarding rent control dispute