Case Summary
Saju John and Jancy Saju are plaintiffs claiming ownership and possession of certain properties against defendants Molly Unni, Unni Joseph, and Vipin Unni. The plaintiffs allege illegal construction by the defendants causing inconvenience and damage to their property.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Permanent prohibitory and mandatory injunction; removal of illegal construction.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
Plaintiffs were found to be in possession of the property and the defendants' actions were deemed detrimental to the plaintiffs' rights.
Plaintiffs were found to be in possession of the property and the defendants' actions were deemed detrimental to the plaintiffs' rights.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, suit is decreed as follows: i. Defendants, their agents, their men or servants, are restrained by way of decree of permanent prohibitory injunction from continuing with the illegal construction being done in the Plaint D and E Schedule properties.
Parties Involved
Plaintiffs
Saju John (60 years)
Kunnathu House, Kunnath Towers, Perumannoor P.O, Thevara, Kochi – 682 015
Jancy Saju (52 years)
Kunnathu House, Kunnath Towers, Perumannoor P.O, Thevara, Kochi –682 015
Defendants
Molly Unni (60 years)
Kaithavalappil, Chakkalakkal Road, Kochi – 682 015
Unni Joseph (70 years)
Kaithavalappil, Chakkalakkal Road, Kochi – 682 015
Vipin Unni (40 years)
Kaithavalappil, Chakkalakkal Road, Kochi – 682 015
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Permanent Injunction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Defendants, their agents, their men or servants, are restrained by way of decree of permanent prohibitory injunction from continuing with the illegal construction being done in the Plaint D and E Schedule properties and from trespassing into the Plaint A and B schedule properties or from causing any kind of inconvenience or damages to the peaceful enjoyment of the Plaint A and B Schedule Properties by the plaintiffs.
Evidence:
Defendants, their agents, their men or servants, are restrained by way of decree of permanent prohibitory injunction from continuing with the illegal construction being done in the Plaint D and E Schedule properties and from trespassing into the Plaint A and B schedule properties or from causing any kind of inconvenience or damages to the peaceful enjoyment of the Plaint A and B Schedule Properties by the plaintiffs.
Relief Type:
Mandatory Injunction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Defendants are directed by way of mandatory injunction to demolish and remove the incomplete illegal construction done in the Plaint D and E Schedule properties.
Evidence:
The defendants are directed by way of mandatory injunction to demolish and remove the incomplete illegal construction done in the Plaint D and E Schedule properties.