Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 748/2019

Case between Sajitha Muhammedkutty vs Nazar et al regarding dismissal of the suit

Court
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-08-12
Duration
approximately-6 years

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Sajitha Muhammedkutty is the plaintiff, and Nazar and others are the defendants. The case was dismissed because the plaintiff was not present and ready for evidence.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the case with costs because the plaintiff was not present and ready for evidence.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff failed to appear and was not ready for evidence.

Judgment Evidence:

Dismissed with cost.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Sajitha Muhammedkutty (42 years) Mekkat Parambil House, Nettoor P.O., Pin - 682 040, Nettoor Desom, Maradu Village, Kanayannur Taluk, Ernakulam District

Defendants

Nazar (42 years) Thekke Elanjickal House, CEPZ P.O., Kakkanadu Desom, Kakkanadu Village, Kanayannur Taluk, Ernakulam District Thankamani (57 years) Kizhakkedath, Kakkanad Village, Kusumagiri P.O, Pin 682 030 Valsa (47 years) Parakkamugal Colony, Kakkanad Village, Kusumagiri P.O, Pin 682 030 Anandu (14 years) Parakkamugal Colony, Kakkanad Village, Kusumagiri P.O, Pin 682 030

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Plaintiff is not present or ready for evidence in listed case.
Evidence:
Dismissed with cost.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam District
Case Filed
Tue, 01/01/2019 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases