Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 741 /2023

Case between Sajith Kumar vs Abdul Haque regarding a civil suit

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany
Order Date
2025-05-29
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Sajith Kumar filed a suit against Abdul Haque. The case was resolved through mediation, leading to a settlement.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit is decreed as per terms of the mediation agreement, which is found to be lawful.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Refund of court fee under section 69A of Kerala Court Fee and Suit Valuation Act
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit is decreed as per terms of the mediation agreement, which is found to be lawful.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Mediation agreement is lawful and terms are satisfactory.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Mediation agreement is lawful and terms are satisfactory.
Supporting Evidence
Terms of mediation agreement is found to be lawful.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit is decreed as per terms of mediation agreement. Mediation agreement shall form part of decree.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sajith Kumar
Party Age
31
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Abdul Haque
Party Age
48
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
T P Santhosh kumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Vinitha S T
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
P T Jose
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
K G Gopakumar
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Suit is decreed as per terms of mediation agreement.
Evidence:
Hence suit is decreed as per terms of mediation agreement.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled for refund of court fee under section 69A of Kerala Court Fee and Suit Valuation Act.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is entitled for refund of court fee under section 69A of Kerala Court Fee and Suit Valuation Act.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sajith Kumar vs Abdul Haque regarding a civil suit
Case Code Year
Case between Sajith Kumar vs Abdul Haque regarding a civil suit

Case Flags

Adalath Resolved
Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam District
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Thu, 05/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sat, 05/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won