Case Summary
Sajikumar, the plaintiff, brought a suit against multiple defendants including Syamakumar and others. The court dismissed the suit due to the plaintiff's failure to appear despite being notified.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit brought by Sajikumar was dismissed due to his absence in court.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff did not appear in court despite being notice, leading to dismissal.
The plaintiff did not appear in court despite being notice, leading to dismissal.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff did not appear in court despite being notice, leading to dismissal.
The plaintiff did not appear in court despite being notice, leading to dismissal.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff submitted no instruction, department notice was issued to Plaintiff. Even inspite due receive of department notice, Plaintiff not turned up.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence I find no reason to proceed with this suit. Hence suit stands dismissed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sajikumar
- Party Age
- 53
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Syamakumar
- Party Age
- 60
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Rajukumar
- Party Age
- 59
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Vijayan
- Party Age
- 62
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Rajan.K
- Party Age
- 68
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. C.Sudheendra Nath
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Meera S.Nath
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Smt. Ahalya.S
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. S.Ananthakrishnan
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. V.S.Sunil kumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. S.Vikraman
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.V.Dinesh
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Goutham.S.S
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Govind.V
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. S.Rajeev
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed due to the Plaintiff's non-appearance after notice.
Evidence:
Hence I find no reason to proceed with this suit. Hence suit stands dismissed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sajikumar vs Syamakumar et al regarding dismissal of suit
Case Code Year
Case between Sajikumar vs Syamakumar et al regarding dismissal of suit