Case Summary
The complainant Sajid filed a case against the accused Abdulla F. M. under the Negotiable Instruments Act. The complainant was absent throughout the proceedings, leading to the dismissal of the case.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Criminal Case
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the complaint due to the absence of the complainant, acquitting the accused.
Key Reasoning:
The absence of the complainant adversely affects his case.
The absence of the complainant adversely affects his case.
Why Defendant Won:
The absence of the complainant adversely affects his case.
The absence of the complainant adversely affects his case.
Supporting Evidence
The absence of complainant without reason adversely affects his case.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, complaint is dismissed and accused is acquitted U/s 256 Cr. P. C. due to the absents of complainant.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sajid
- Party Age
- 42
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Abdulla F. M.
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Proof affidavit filed.
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Ansi G.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- K. P. Rajeevan
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Jabish O. T.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Complaint is dismissed due to the absence of the complainant.
Evidence:
Hence, complaint is dismissed and accused is acquitted U/s 256 Cr. P. C. due to the absents of complainant.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Criminal Case
Category
Cheque Bounce Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
ST.
Case Code Year
2024
Case Flags
Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 N.I. Act