Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 207/2021

Case between Saji Jacob vs Jose philip regarding prohibitory injunction

Court
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Judge
Smt. Indu P Raj
Order Date
2025-11-27
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Saji Jacob, the plaintiff, is seeking a prohibitory injunction against Jose Philip, the defendant, regarding access to a 10-feet motorable pathway. The plaintiff claims a prescriptive easement for access through the defendant's property which the defendant disputes.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, permanently restraining the defendant from obstructing the plaintiff’s use of the pathway.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Permanent injunction restraining the defendant from obstructing the plaintiff's use of the pathway.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, permanently restraining the defendant from obstructing the plaintiff’s use of the pathway.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff established a valid easement by grant.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff established a valid easement by grant.
Supporting Evidence
The evidence adduced herein shows that plaintiff was ready to tender the balance. Defendant had imposed new conditions not contained in Ext.A6. Stop-payment was issued only after defendant refused to perform his part.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: 1. The defendant, his men, agents, or anyone claiming under him are permanently restrained from obstructing, interfering with, narrowing, or in any manner disturbing the plaintiff’s peaceful use of the 10-feet motorable pathway passing through Item No.2 property as shown in Ext.C1(a) sketch.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Saji Jacob
Party Age
51
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jose philip
Party Age
63
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Copy of sale deed No.2756/1959, Copy of gift deed No. 2547/1964, Copy of sale deed No. 468/1971, Copy of partition deed No.1334/05, Original of land tax receipt No. KL05030200242/2021, Original agreement executed between the plaintiff and defendant, Bank pass book of Saji Jacob (A/c No. 57050862938) SBI, Pallickathodu Branch
Defendants Documents
Commission Report, Rough Sketch

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
D Zaibo
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Anil D Kartha
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Prohibitory injunction restraining the defendant from obstructing the plaintiff's use of the pathway.
Evidence:
The defendant, his men, agents, or anyone claiming under him are permanently restrained from obstructing, interfering with, narrowing, or in any manner disturbing the plaintiff’s peaceful use of the 10-feet motorable pathway.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff entitled to costs of the suit.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to costs of the suit.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of sale deed establishing ownership of property.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Gift Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of gift deed relating to family property.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of sale deed for property.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Partition Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of partition deed indicating division of property among heirs.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Land Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original land tax receipt for property verification.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Way Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original agreement establishing terms for road access.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Bank Passbook
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Bank passbook evidencing transactions related to the agreement.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Commissioner's report confirming existence and access of the pathway.
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type: Rough Sketch
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Sketch illustrating the pathway layout and access.
Reference:
Ext.C1(a)
Document Type: Unknown
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Exhibit marked on behalf of the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.B1

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Property and Possession Disputes
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Obstruction of easementary right
Case Code
Case between Saji Jacob vs Jose philip regarding prohibitory injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Saji Jacob vs Jose philip regarding prohibitory injunction

Case Flags

Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque dishonour

Quick Facts

Location
Kottayam District
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Thressiamma Kunjumon et al vs Pennamma Devasia et al regarding declaration and partition
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between James P.George et al vs Pallikathodu Gramapanchayat et al regarding declaration and injunction
Court of the Munsiff, Kottayam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Lalu Thomas vs V.C. Yohannan regarding fixation of boundary and injunction
Principal Munsiff's Court
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Aleyamma @ Ajitha vs Ajith P Markose et al regarding recovery of possession.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between C T Muraleedharan Nair vs Savithri Amma et al regarding declaration, recovery of possession and permanent prohibitory injunction.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won