Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
R.C.P. No. 168/2024

Case between Sajeevan M.K. vs Sasikala S. regarding vacant possession of property

Court
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
SMT. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2025-06-11
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Sajeevan M.K. filed a petition regarding the possession of a property against Sasikala S. The respondent surrendered the vacant possession, leading to the dismissal of the case.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court accepted a memo indicating that the respondent surrendered the property, thus dismissing the petition as not pressed.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court accepted a memo indicating that the respondent surrendered the property, thus dismissing the petition as not pressed.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Rent control petition dismissed as not pressed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sajeevan M.K.
Party Age
56
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sasikala S.
Party Age
58
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Rent Control Petition
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
A.Balagopalan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
A.Rajagopalan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
M.N.Manmadan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Prabhu Murali Krishnan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sruthy R Menon
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sojo J. Kallidukkal
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Hima Harikrishnan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Petition dismissed as not pressed due to the respondent surrendering the vacant possession of the property.
Evidence:
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that respondent surrendered the vacant possession of petition schedule property, hence not proceeding with this case.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sajeevan M.K. vs Sasikala S. regarding vacant possession of property
Case Code Year
Case between Sajeevan M.K. vs Sasikala S. regarding vacant possession of property

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sun, 06/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between V.K.Jayachandran vs Nisha M.V regarding petition under Section 11(2)(b) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control)Act, 1965
THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Rent Control Petition Unknown
Case between Liya George vs Sulaiman regarding Petition under Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965
THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Rent Control Petition Dismissed
Case between Robin Thomas Vaidyan vs RAHA Ayurveda Hospital et al regarding eviction
Court of the Third Additional Munsiff & Rent Controller, Ernakulam
Rent Control Petition Unknown
Case between Mrs. Susan Jacob John @ Susan John & Dr. Maria Kuriakose vs Mr. Annekot Ramadasan Padmakumar regarding Petition filed under Section 11(2)(b) of the Kerala (Buildings Lease & Rent Control) Act, 1965
The Third Additional Munsiff & Rent Controller, Ernakulam
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Munir Gul Mohammed Sait et al vs K.M. Abdulla et al regarding Rent Control Petition
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Rent Control Petition Unknown