Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS 296/2025

Case between Sajeev Kumar G vs Saraswathy S regarding injunction

Court
ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF COURT
Judge
Smt. Sofia.T.A
Order Date
2025-04-11
Duration
Case Code No.
296
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Sajeev Kumar G is the plaintiff seeking an injunction against Saraswathy S. The case involves a request for protection of the plaintiff's peaceful possession and enjoyment of property.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court granted an Ad-Interim Injunction preventing the respondent from obstructing the plaintiff's possession of the property.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Ad-Interim Injunction
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The court granted an Ad-Interim Injunction preventing the respondent from obstructing the plaintiff's possession of the property.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found that a prima facie case existed and that delay in issuing notice would defeat the purpose of the injunction.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
I am satisfied that if the notice is issued before granting the injunction, the resultant delay would defeat the purpose of granting the injunction.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, the respondent and her agents are hereby restrained from unlawfully obstructing or interfering with the plaintiff’s peaceful possession and enjoyment of the plaint schedule property until further order.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sajeev Kumar G
Party Age
46
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Saraswathy S.
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Farook Nizar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Nil
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Ad-Interim Injunction to prevent the respondent from obstructing the plaintiff’s possession.
Evidence:
I am satisfied that if the notice is issued before granting the injunction, the resultant delay would defeat the purpose of granting the injunction.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS
Case Code Year
2025

Quick Facts

Location
KOLLAM
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 03/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 04/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Shyla et al vs Rini Titus et al regarding injunction
THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, KOLLAM.
Injunction Defendant Won
Case between Ambujakshy vs Sambasivan et al regarding Injunction
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Injunction Defendant Won
Case between Madhavan Pillai vs Harish.M regarding Injunction
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM.
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between P.Sunilkumar vs Radhakrishnan Nair et al regarding Injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Injunction Defendant Won
Case between Vasanthakumari et al vs Divakaran.K et al regarding Injunction
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Injunction Defendant Won