Case Summary
Sajeena.R, the plaintiff, brought a suit against the defendant Satheeshan. The case was dismissed for default as the plaintiff was absent and made no representation.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence from the proceedings.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff's absence led to the dismissal of the case.
The plaintiff's absence led to the dismissal of the case.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff's absence led to the dismissal of the case.
The plaintiff's absence led to the dismissal of the case.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff absent, no representation.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence suit dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sajeena.R
- Party Age
- 47
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Satheeshan
- Party Age
- 47
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Kamaleswaram S. Manikantan Nair
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Vaishakh.M.S
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed for default as the plaintiff was absent and no representation was made.
Evidence:
Hence suit dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sajeena.R vs Satheeshan regarding default dismissal
Case Code Year
Case between Sajeena.R vs Satheeshan regarding default dismissal