Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS 341/2025

Case between Sainaba vs John K.J et al regarding declaration of easement and permanent injunction.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Judge
Smt. Indu P. Raj
Order Date
2025-11-20
Duration
Case Code No.
341
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves a dispute where the plaintiff, Sainaba, is seeking a declaration of easement and a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, John K.J and Philip K.K. The plaintiff claims objection against the obstruction caused to the property in question.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The application for the issuance of a second Advocate Commission by the defendants has been dismissed with costs.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The application for the issuance of a second Advocate Commission by the defendants has been dismissed with costs.
Key Reasoning:
The earlier Advocate Commissioner conducted a proper and legally sufficient inspection.
Why Defendant Won:
The earlier Advocate Commissioner conducted a proper and legally sufficient inspection.
Supporting Evidence
The earlier Advocate Commissioner has conducted a proper, comprehensive and legally sufficient inspection. The nature of the property being a waterlogged nilam makes age determination of the pathway inherently impossible; therefore a second commission would serve no useful purpose.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result: The application for issuance of a second Advocate Commission is dismissed with costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sainaba
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
John K.J
Party Age
84
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Philip K.K @ Vinod
Party Age
50
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Boby George Kurian
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Muhammed Nizar. N.P
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Refused
Description:
The application for issuance of a second Advocate Commission is dismissed.
Evidence:
Therefore, I hold that a second commission is unwarranted, legally impermissible, and factually unnecessary in this case.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS
Case Code Year
2025

Quick Facts

Location
Kottayam
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between State Bank of India vs Nishana K C regarding decree of suit
Munsiff Court/Judicial First Class Magistrate -IV, Kottayam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Asset Sapphire Apartment Owners Association vs Amal Shaji et al regarding petition for document production
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Aniyamma Joseph et al vs Akhil Joseph et al regarding civil matters.
Munsiff Court/ Judicial First Class Magistrate -IV, Kottayam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ajitha Jibi vs Sherin Mathew et al regarding compromise petition.
Munsiff Court/ Judicial First Class Magistrate -IV, Kottayam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Surendran et al vs Daniel. K.P. et al regarding partition of property.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won