Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 1270 /2018

Case between Sagarika Arts and Sports Club vs Siju et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Court
II Additional Munsiff, Ernakulam
Judge
Smt. Needi.K. Dinamany
Order Date
2024-07-03
Duration
approximately-5 years 20 days

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Sagarika Arts and Sports Club, seeks a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, Siju and Ammini Joseph, who are claiming rights over the property. The plaintiff asserts that the defendants are obstructing their reconstruction efforts on the property owned by the plaintiff's club.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit has been dismissed as the plaintiff failed to prove exclusive lawful possession of the plaint schedule property and no injunction is granted in favor of the plaintiff.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff could not prove exclusive ownership or lawful possession of the property in question.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is dismissed. No order as to costs.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Sagarika Arts and Sports Club (Age not specified years) South Chittoor P.O., Cochin - 27

Defendants

Siju (45 years) Azhikkakath veedu, Vayalar Road, South Chittoor, Cochin – 27 Ammini Joseph (65 years) Azhikkakath veedu, Vayalar Road, South Chittoor, Cochin – 27 The Secretary, Cheranelloor Grama Panchayath (Age not specified years) The District Collector, Ernakulam (Age not specified years)

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Plaintiff requested a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants.
Evidence:
Since the plaintiff is not in exclusive possession of the plaint schedule property and no pattayam has been obtained by the plaintiff for the purampokku land wherein the building of the plaintiff club is situated, no injunction can be granted in favour of plaintiff.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: By-Law
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document outlining the operational rules of the Sagarika Arts and Sports Club.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Registration Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proof of the club's registration under the Registration Act.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Ownership Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certificate showing ownership issued by Cheranelloor Grama Panchayat.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Sketch
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Sketch showing the location of the plaintiff's property.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Complaint
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Complaint submitted to the District Collector regarding issues faced by the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Acknowledgment Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Receipt for the complaint submitted to the District Collector.
Reference:
Ext.A5(a)
Document Type: Complaint
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Complaint made before the City Police Commissioner by the first defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Letter from the President of Cheranelloor Grama Panchayat.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Complaint
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Complaint made to the City Police Commissioner by the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Electricity Bill
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Bill for electricity used by the club.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: Complaint
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Complaint made before the District Collector.
Reference:
Ext.A10
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Report filed by the advocate commissioner regarding the property.
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type: Rough Sketch
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Sketch filed along with the commission report.
Reference:
Ext.C1(a)

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Mon, 01/01/2018 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases