Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 463/2021

Case between Safia Ibrahim, W/o Ibrahim vs Jessy et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M., I Additional Munsiff
Order Date
2025-02-13
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Neighbors Safia Ibrahim and defendants Jessy et al are in dispute over encroachment on a public road. Defendants tried to reduce the width of the road by constructing a compound wall. Safia seeks a permanent prohibitory injunction to prevent interference with the road.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
Plaintiff Safia Ibrahim granted permanent prohibitory injunction against defendants to prevent encroachment on a public road.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:

Judgment Evidence:

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Safia Ibrahim (60 years years) Vazhuthanakkadu house, Vattekunnam, North Edappally P.O, Kochi - 682 024, Ernakulam District

Defendants

Jessy (50 years years) Manjalamparambil veedu, Vattekkunnam, North Edappally P.O, Pin - 682 024, Ernakulam District Riaz (26 years years) Manjalamparambil veedu, Vattekkunnam, North Edappally P.O, Pin - 682 024, Ernakulam District Rameez (Age not specified years) Manjalamparambil veedu, Vattekkunnam, North Edappally P.O, Pin - 682 024, Ernakulam District M.K.Nazar (58 years years) Manjalamparambil veedu, Vattekkunnam, North Edappally P.O, Pin - 682 024, Ernakulam District Secretary, Kalamassery Muncipality (Age not specified years) Not mentioned

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff granted permanent prohibitory injunction against defendants 1-4 from constructing compound wall over plaint 'C' schedule road
Evidence:
The judgment decree ordering the permanent injunction

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Certified copy of the document no. 1884/2006 of SRO Edapally
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Plaintiff's proof of ownership of property 'A' schedule
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Reply obtained from the Public information officer, Kalamassery Municipality
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Reply regarding the lawsuit subject to objection
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Certified copy of the Decree in OS 1132/13 of the 2nd Additional Munsiff court, Ernakulam
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Decree related to another suit
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Certified copy of the mediation agreement along with sketch
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Mediation agreement details
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Photographs (5nos)
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Photographs of plaint 'C' schedule property
Reference:
Ext.A5 series

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
70%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases