Case Summary
Neighbors Safia Ibrahim and defendants Jessy et al are in dispute over encroachment on a public road. Defendants tried to reduce the width of the road by constructing a compound wall. Safia seeks a permanent prohibitory injunction to prevent interference with the road.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Plaintiff Safia Ibrahim granted permanent prohibitory injunction against defendants to prevent encroachment on a public road.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Safia Ibrahim
- Party Age
- 60
- Relation
- W/o Ibrahim
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Jessy
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- W/o M.K.Nazar
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Riaz
- Party Age
- 26
- Relation
- S/o M.K.Nazar
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Rameez
- Relation
- S/o M.K.Nazar
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- M.K.Nazar
- Party Age
- 58
- Relation
- S/o Father's name not known
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Secretary, Kalamassery Muncipality
Plaintiffs Documents
Certified copy of the document no. 1884/2006 of SRO Edapally. Photographs (5nos) (subject to objection).
Defendants Documents
The certified copy of the Partition deed no. 5266/93 of SRO Edappally, The certified copy of the Sale deed no. 3532/2001 of SRO Edappally, The original tax paid receipt bearing no. KL07021816279/2024 issued by Thrikkakkara north village office.
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- N.C.Joseph
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- M.P.Rexy
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- K.Antony Joseph
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Jinishlal S.B
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendants
- Advocate Name
- Vipin D.G
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendants
- Advocate Name
- Daniel A.J
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendants
- Advocate Name
- Karol Mathews
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendants
- Advocate Name
- Sebastian Alencherry
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendants
- Advocate Name
- Manisha V.V
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendants
- Advocate Name
- Anna Rose Nambadan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendants
- Advocate Name
- M.K.Aboobacker
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendants
- Advocate Name
- D.M.Noufal
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Permanent Injunction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Plaintiff granted permanent prohibitory injunction against defendants 1-4 from constructing compound wall over plaint 'C' schedule road
Evidence:
The judgment decree ordering the permanent injunction
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Certified copy of the document no. 1884/2006 of SRO Edapally
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Plaintiff's proof of ownership of property 'A' schedule
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type:
Reply obtained from the Public information officer, Kalamassery Municipality
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Reply regarding the lawsuit subject to objection
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type:
Certified copy of the Decree in OS 1132/13 of the 2nd Additional Munsiff court, Ernakulam
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Decree related to another suit
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type:
Certified copy of the mediation agreement along with sketch
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Mediation agreement details
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type:
Photographs (5nos)
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Photographs of plaint 'C' schedule property
Reference:
Ext.A5 series
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Safia Ibrahim, W/o Ibrahim vs Jessy et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Safia Ibrahim, W/o Ibrahim vs Jessy et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction