Case Summary
Sabu, the plaintiff, filed a suit against Venugopalan K.V, the defendant. The case ultimately resulted in a compromise between the parties.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Court Fee shall be refunded to plaintiff subject to Section 69 Kerala Court Fees and Suit Valuation Act.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed a compromise petition filed by the parties. The case was closed in terms of the compromise, with court fees to be refunded to the plaintiff.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Compromise term found lawful.
Compromise term found lawful.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Compromise term found lawful.
Compromise term found lawful.
Supporting Evidence
Compromise term found lawful.
Judgment Evidence:
Compromise petition allowed. Compromise term found lawful. Closed in terms of compromise incorporating terms of compromise.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sabu
- Party Age
- 55
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Venugopalan K.V
- Party Age
- 65
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- L. Aloysius Thomas
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Kishore Kumar M.V
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Compromise petition allowed and terms found lawful.
Evidence:
Compromise petition allowed. Compromise term found lawful.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sabu vs Venugopalan K.V regarding a civil matter.
Case Code Year
Case between Sabu vs Venugopalan K.V regarding a civil matter.
Case Flags
Out-of-Court Settlement