Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 827/2021

Case between Sabu vs Venugopalan K.V regarding a civil matter.

Court
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2024-07-22
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Sabu, the plaintiff, filed a suit against Venugopalan K.V, the defendant. The case ultimately resulted in a compromise between the parties.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed a compromise petition filed by the parties. The case was closed in terms of the compromise, with court fees to be refunded to the plaintiff.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Court Fee shall be refunded to plaintiff subject to Section 69 Kerala Court Fees and Suit Valuation Act.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
Compromise term found lawful.

Judgment Evidence:

Compromise petition allowed. Compromise term found lawful. Closed in terms of compromise incorporating terms of compromise.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Sabu (55 years years) Puthukkatt House (Tharayil) RPM School Road, Kumbalam, PIN 682 506

Defendants

Venugopalan K.V (65 years years) Kallumadathil, Proprietor, FABRICO, Cleanup Laundry, 7/450-9, Bishop JP’s Complex, Thengode P.O, (East) Kakkanad – 682 030, Ernakulam District

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Compromise petition allowed and terms found lawful.
Evidence:
Compromise petition allowed. Compromise term found lawful.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
70%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases