OS. No. 920/2017

Case between Sabeena vs State of Kerala et al regarding fixation of boundary and injunction

Court

COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM.

Judge

Smt. Ragi.S.

Order Date

2025-09-29

Duration

Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Sabeena, filed this suit for fixation of boundary and injunction. The case was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the plaintiff's absence.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Case Type

Civil Suit

Final Judgment

The suit was dismissed as the plaintiff failed to appear for court. The judgment was pronounced in open court.

Key Reasoning:

Why Defendant Won:

Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Since the plaintiff remained absent suit dismissed for want of prosecution.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Sabeena
Party Age: 24
Relation: D/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: State of Kerala
Relation: represented by

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Asst. Engineer, P.W.D.Office, Chathanoor

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Nizam
Party Age: 40
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Sheheer
Party Age: 90
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Ameer
Party Age: 29
Relation: S/o

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Kishore.P
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: K.P. Jabbar
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Sukul Khader Z.A
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Jose Pious
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction

Outcome: Dismissed

Description:

Suit filed for fixation of boundary and injunction

Evidence: