O.S. No.1426/2023

Case between Sabeena S vs Christudas et al regarding dismissal for default

Court

COURT OF I st ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF

Judge

Smt. Karthika.A.R

Order Date

2025-03-04

Duration

Case Closed

Tue, 03/04/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Sabeena S filed a suit against Christudas and others. The court dismissed the suit for default due to the absence of the first defendant and lack of action against the second defendant.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Case Type

Civil Suit

Final Judgment

The suit was dismissed for default due to the first defendant's absence and lack of steps against the second defendant.

Key Reasoning:
The first defendant was set ex parte due to not appearing or filing written statements, leading to a dismissal of the suit.

Why Defendant Won:
The first defendant was set ex parte due to not appearing or filing written statements, leading to a dismissal of the suit.

Supporting Evidence

The court found that the first defendant did not appear or file a written statement, resulting in the suit being dismissed.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, the suit is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Sabeena S
Party Age: 64

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Christudas
Party Age: 65
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Muralidharan
Party Age: 50
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Jayadeth
Party Age: 58
Relation: S/o

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Sri. K Vinodsen
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other

Outcome: Rejected

Description:

The suit is dismissed for default.

Evidence: