Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 234 /2018

Case between Sabastian J. Parappurath vs Mr. Kumar T. Menon et al regarding abatement of suit

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
SRI. REGHUNATH N.S.
Order Date
2024-01-20
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves Sabastian J. Parappurath as the plaintiff, who has passed away. The defendants were present, and no action was taken to include the legal heirs of the plaintiff in the case.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit has been dismissed as the plaintiff is no more and no legal heirs have been impleaded.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit has been dismissed as the plaintiff is no more and no legal heirs have been impleaded.
Key Reasoning:
The suit was dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiff and failure to implead legal heirs.
Why Defendant Won:
The suit was dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiff and failure to implead legal heirs.
Supporting Evidence
No steps are seen taken for impleading legal heirs of plaintiff.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, suit is abated. Suit is dismissed. No costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sabastian J. Parappurath
Party Age
72
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mr. Kumar T. Menon
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mrs. Gita Menon alias Geetha Menon
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mrs. Kumari Nair
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M/s. Panjos Builders Private Ltd.
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mr. Jose Mani
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
G.G. Manoj
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
P.M. Benzir
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sarath Prasad S.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Ayshamma Abraham
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
V. Thulaseedharan Pillai
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
M.N. Manmadan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
Suit abated due to the plaintiff's death.
Evidence:
No steps are seen taken for impleading legal heirs of plaintiff. Hence, suit is abated.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed.
Evidence:
Suit is dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sabastian J. Parappurath vs Mr. Kumar T. Menon et al regarding abatement of suit
Case Code Year
Case between Sabastian J. Parappurath vs Mr. Kumar T. Menon et al regarding abatement of suit

Quick Facts

Location
ERNAKULAM
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 01/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Wed, 01/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won