Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No.6/1997

Case between S Abdul Razzak vs C B Suraja Devi et al regarding setting aside the commission report

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany
Order Date
2025-01-10
Duration
approximately-27 years

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves the plaintiff S Abdul Razzak and defendants C B Suraja Devi and V P Omkumar. The defendants filed a petition to set aside a commission report related to the measurement of properties based on title deeds.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the defendants' petition, setting aside the commission report and plan dated 05.11.2018 as it did not tally with the title deeds of the parties.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The court found discrepancies in the commission reports and plans that warranted the setting aside of the commission.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, Petition is allowed. Ext.C4 and C4(a) commission report and plan dated 05.11.2018 are set aside.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

S Abdul Razzak (Age not specified years) 44/1257A, Kaloor, Kochi- 682017

Defendants

C B Suraja Devi (Age not specified years) House No: 27, A C S R A, Panackal House, Lane 2, AC.S Road, Kaloor, Kochi- 682017 V P Omkumar (Age not specified years) House No: 27, A C S R A, Panackal House, Lane 2, AC.S Road, Kaloor, Kochi- 682017

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The petition to set aside the commission report and plan was allowed.
Evidence:
Accordingly, I find merit in the above petition.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The Ext.C4 and C4(a) commission report and plan dated 05.11.2018 are set aside.
Evidence:
Petition is allowed.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
Costs were to be borne by the respective parties.
Evidence:
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the parties shall bear their respective costs.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Filed by Advocate A Balagopalan, the report was central to the court's decision to set aside the previous measurement report.
Reference:
Ext.C4
Document Type: Sketch
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Prepared by Sethumadhavan Nair, this sketch was submitted alongside the commission report and was also considered in the court's evaluation.
Reference:
Ext.C4(a)

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Wed, 01/01/1997 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases