Case Summary
This case involves Rukhiya Nazim as the plaintiff and T.M Sreevalsan as the defendant. The court dismissed the suit due to the absence of representation for both sides.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Dismissed
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court found no representation for both the plaintiff and the defendant and thus dismissed the suit.
Key Reasoning:
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
No representation for both sides. Dismissed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Rukhiya Nazim
- Party Age
- 60
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- T.M Sreevalsan
- Party Age
- 65
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Prakash P George
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sajid P.S
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sader E Reax
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Abijith M
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Aswinkumar M.J
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Rukhiya Nazim vs T.M Sreevalsan regarding dismissal of suit
Case Code Year
Case between Rukhiya Nazim vs T.M Sreevalsan regarding dismissal of suit