Case Summary
The plaintiff, Royichan S, filed a suit against Rajamma and Manoj. The court heard the case but dismissed it for default due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of representation.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed for default due to the absence of the plaintiff and no representation in court.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff did not appear in court, leading to dismissal of the case.
The plaintiff did not appear in court, leading to dismissal of the case.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff did not appear in court, leading to dismissal of the case.
The plaintiff did not appear in court, leading to dismissal of the case.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff absent, no representation. No proof affidavit filed. Suit dismissed for default.
Judgment Evidence:
Suit dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Royichan S
- Party Age
- 42
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Rajamma
- Party Age
- 80
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Manoj
- Party Age
- 48
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Arunchand C.A
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Prem Sankar K
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Royichan S vs Rajamma et al regarding suit filed under Section 26 and Order 7 Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure
Case Code Year
Case between Royichan S vs Rajamma et al regarding suit filed under Section 26 and Order 7 Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure