Case Summary
The plaintiffs, Roy Jose and others, did not appear in court, leading to the dismissal of their suit. The defendants were represented by their counsel.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiffs failed to appear in court.
The plaintiffs failed to appear in court.
Judgment Evidence:
Suit dismissed. Pending IAs closed.
Parties Involved
Plaintiffs
Roy Jose (54 years years)
Koppaithara, Mulanthuruthy Ward No. 11, Mulanthuruthy Village, Mulanthuruthy Kara, Mulanthuruthy P.O., Pin – 682 314.
C.J Sebastian (71 years years)
Chitteltazhath, Amballoor Village, Amballoor Kara, Amballoor Panchayath Ward-2, Kanayannur Taluk, Emakulam District, Pincode - 682 315.
Jemy Francis (57 years years)
Paremakkal House, Pyngarappilly P.O., Pynangarappilly Kara, Mulanthuruthy Village, Ward - 9 of Amballoor Panchayath, Kanayannur Taluk, Eranakulam District, Pin – 682 314.
Basil. L. Kizhakkedam (61 years years)
Kizhakkedam House, Perumpally P.O., Mulanthuruthy Village, Kanayannur Taluk, Ernakulam District, Pincode – 682 314.
Thomas Joseph (60 years years)
Paikayil, Amballoor P.O, Amballoor Village, Ward No. 2 of Amballoor panchayath, Kanayannur Taluk, Ernakulam District, Pincode - 682 315.
Defendants
Syro-malabar Major Archi-Episcopal Church (Age not specified years)
represented by its Major Arch Bishop, St. Thomas Mount P.B. No. 3110, Thrikkakara Village, Kanayannur Taluk, Kakkanad PO., Kochi – 682 630.
The Ernakulam - Angamali Arch Diocese (Age not specified years)
represented by its Apostolic Administrator, Arch Bishop's House, P.O. Box No. 2580, Ernakulam Village, Kanayannur Taluk, Ernakulam – 682 031.
St. Francis Assissi Church (Age not specified years)
Amballoor, Amballoor Village, Pin – 682 315, Kanayannur Taluk.
Rev. Fr. Sajukoren @ Elias Koren (49 years years)
Vicar, St. Francis Assissi Church, Amballoor, Amballoor Village, Pin – 682 315, Kanayannur Taluk.
Others (Age not specified years)
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
Suit dismissed due to lack of representation from the plaintiff.
Evidence:
Plaintiff no representation. Defendant No. 3 Trustee represented. Defendant No. 1 represented. Defendant No. 2 no representation. Defendant No. 3 Vicar represented. Plaintiff not present or represented and has not taken steps as ordered. Suit dismissed.