Case Summary
The plaintiff, Roy George Sharon, brought a suit against defendants Roy Thomas Zubin and Santha Roy. The court found that there was no cause of action and dismissed the case due to the absence of all parties.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Dismissed
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The case was dismissed by the court due to the absence of both parties and the lack of a cause of action.
Key Reasoning:
The court found that there was no cause of action in the case.
The court found that there was no cause of action in the case.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court found that there was no cause of action in the case.
The court found that there was no cause of action in the case.
Supporting Evidence
It is prima facie seen that there is no issue involved in the case at hand and prima facie there is no cause of action.
Judgment Evidence:
Both parties are absent without representation on day posted for hearing on maintainability. Dismissed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Roy George Sharon
- Party Age
- 40
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Roy Thomas Zubin
- Party Age
- 36
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Santha Roy
- Party Age
- 68
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Arjun S Raj
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Arun Raj S
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Joseph George
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Roy George Sharon vs Roy Thomas Zubin, Santha Roy regarding dismissal of suit
Case Code Year
Case between Roy George Sharon vs Roy Thomas Zubin, Santha Roy regarding dismissal of suit